Supply of equipment for the project entitled: "Climate protection using new technologies"

Delivery of unmanned aerial vehicles along with STS pilot courses

Delivery of computer equipment and GPS navigation devices

Delivery of satellite phones

Delivery of equipment for counteracting threats and eliminating their consequences

Part of the order no. 1 – "Delivery of unmanned aerial vehicles along with STS pilot courses" 1. As part of part of the order no. 1, the Contractor will be obliged to deliver: 1) for the Węgierska Górka Commune: a) 5 unmanned aerial vehicles, b) 4 SAR software licenses, c) 1 unmanned aerial vehicle with a docking station, d) conduct an STS-02 pilot course for operating unmanned aerial vehicles for 16 people; 2) for the Lipowa Commune: a) 2 unmanned aerial vehicles, b) 2 SAR software licenses, c) 1 unmanned aerial vehicle with a docking station, d) conduct an STS-02 pilot course for operating unmanned aerial vehicles for 4 people; – as part of the project entitled: "Climate protection using new technologies". 2. Details of the scope of the subject of all parts of the order are specified in appendix no. 7 to the SWZ – Description of the Subject of the Order, and the requirements for the execution of the order in appendix no. 8 to the SWZ – Draft contract. 3. Equivalence clause: a) The Contracting Authority, in accordance with the provisions of art. 99 sec. 5 and art. 101 sec. 4 of the Public Procurement Law, allows equivalent solutions for supplies, works, materials, systems meeting the requirements specified in the procurement documents. The Contracting Authority reserves that wherever in the content of appendix no. 7 to the SWZ – Description of the Subject of the Order, constituting the description of the subject of the order, trademarks, patents or origin of devices or materials have been indicated in the description of this subject, they should be treated solely as proposals. The Contracting Authority allows methods, materials, devices, systems, technologies, etc. equivalent to those presented in the description of the subject of the order. It is therefore permissible to propose in the offer any equivalent market counterparts with properties no worse than those indicated by the Contracting Authority. The parameters indicated in the procurement documents define the minimum technical, operational, utility, quality and functional conditions that the subject of the order must meet. The offer may include methods, materials, devices, systems, technologies, but with technical, quality and utility and functional parameters. At the request of the Contracting Authority, the Contractor is obliged to prove that the applied solutions will allow achieving all technical assumptions for the investment task in question, taking into account the entire investment, and not a selected fragment of the whole. The burden of proving that the material or device is equivalent to the requirement specified by the Contracting Authority rests with the Contractor. If the materials or/and devices offered by the Contractor as equivalent are not equivalent in the light of the documents submitted by the Contractor, the offer of this Contractor will be rejected as not corresponding to the content of the SWZ. The Contracting Authority also indicates, in accordance with art. 101 sec. 4 of the Public Procurement Law, that wherever the description of the subject of the order refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems. The Contracting Authority allows solutions equivalent to those described. In such a case, the procedure described in the earlier content of this point applies accordingly; b) in the case of technologies, systems, materials or devices accepted by the Contractor for valuation as equivalent, the offer must be accompanied by a list of these technologies, systems, devices or materials, which will contain: the type and description of the technology or system used, the name of the device/material used, the name of the manufacturer, the precise and unambiguous type of device or material; c) furthermore, for equivalent technologies/systems/devices/materials, the Contracting Authority requires documentation of equivalence, among others, by means of calculations, detailed technical drawings, certificates, approvals, declarations of conformity with regulations and standards and catalog cards of manufacturers of equivalent devices/materials attached to the list of equivalent technologies/systems/devices/materials. These documents must unequivocally state the equivalence of the proposed technologies/systems/devices/materials; d) in case of doubts as to the equivalence of the substitutes for equivalent technologies/systems/devices/materials proposed in the offer, the Contracting Authority at the stage of examining the offer may require proof (documentation) of equivalence. In particular, for this purpose, it may request the Contractor to present manufacturer's catalogs of the given equivalent technology/systems/devices/materials. In particular, equivalent technology/systems/devices/materials will be assessed in terms of the possibility of achieving the specified level of functionality, operating costs, and operational reliability for the technology/systems/devices/materials.